← All comparisons

Projelli vs Cursor (for non-code writing).

Cursor is, by a wide margin, the best AI tool for writing code. Some founders try to use it for everything else too: pitch decks, customer interviews, weekly reviews, planning docs. It mostly works, but it's a code editor with prose support, not a writing tool with code support. Projelli is the inverse: a writing-and-planning tool with the founder-specific templates and Markdown-first archive built in. If you ship code, you probably want both. If you only ship code, just use Cursor.

The honest answer up front

If you're a developer using Cursor for code and looking at it for the rest of your founder workflow, the question is whether the marginal benefit of a separate writing tool is worth the friction of switching. For most indie founders who do meaningful strategic writing (pitch decks, customer research, planning, weekly reviews), the answer is yes. For developers whose "writing" is mostly README files and inline docs, the answer is probably no, just stay in Cursor.

The TL;DR table

FeatureCursorProjelli
Primary purposeAI-assisted code editingAI-assisted founder writing
File typesAny text; optimized for codeMarkdown / docs / aichat / workflow
Pricing$20/mo Pro, free tier limited$49 once + your AI provider's API
BYOKPro tier supports BYOKYes, all 3 providers
Where data livesLocal files (your codebase)Local files (your workspace folder)
Founder workflow templatesNo15 specific templates
Markdown-friendly editorYes (it's a text editor)Yes (CodeMirror with Markdown extensions)
Wiki-links + backlinksNoYes
Document workflows (DOCX, XLSX)NoRead/write .docx, .xlsx, .pptx, .pdf
Code completion / inline editsIndustry-leadingNo (not a code editor)
AI chat in sidebarYesYes
Audio recording + waveformNoYes
Whiteboard / canvasNoYes

Where Projelli wins (for non-code writing)

1. Founder workflow templates with structured AI interviews

Cursor lets you chat with AI about a file. Projelli lets you run a Pitch Deck template that walks you through the 10 slides, asks the right questions, and produces a finished deck doc. The structured interview saves the "what should I write next" decision overhead.

2. Document file types beyond Markdown

If your founder workflow includes editing a Word doc your accountant sent, working in an Excel financial model, or annotating a PDF deck, Projelli handles all of these natively. Cursor handles them as text only (and not particularly well for binary formats).

3. Wiki-links and backlinks across documents

Cursor's "linked files" concept is for code dependencies. Projelli's `[[wiki-link]]` syntax connects strategic docs to each other, building a backlink graph as you work. For an archive of customer interviews, persona docs, and pitch deck drafts, this matters.

4. Audio recording + transcription

Founders record customer interviews. Projelli has a waveform editor with transcription. Cursor doesn't.

5. The "founder mental model" UI

Cursor's sidebar, file tree, and tab UX are tuned for code. Projelli's are tuned for founder docs (status bar shows word count not line count; tabs group by topic; file tree colored by document type).

Where Cursor wins (for code)

1. Code completion at the cursor

Cursor's inline completion is the best on the market. Projelli has nothing equivalent and shouldn't try.

2. Multi-file code editing with AI

Cursor's "Composer" and agent mode that edits across files in your repo is genuinely useful for shipping code. Projelli's AI works file-by-file and isn't tuned for codebase-wide refactoring.

3. Codebase-aware context

Cursor indexes your codebase semantically and pulls relevant code into the AI's context automatically. Projelli has full-text search across documents but doesn't claim to be a code intelligence tool.

4. Polish for developer workflows

Git integration, terminal, debugger, language server protocol, syntax highlighting for hundreds of languages. Cursor inherits all this from VS Code. Projelli has clean Markdown editing and that's it.

Should you use both?

For a typical indie founder who ships code, yes. The split:

Both tools support BYOK with the same Anthropic / OpenAI / Google keys, so the API cost is shared across the two tools. Both keep data on your machine. They don't overlap; they live in different parts of your workflow.

Pricing comparison over 3 years

Cursor ProProjelli + BYOKCursor + Projelli
Year 1$240$49 + $60-180 BYOK$240 + $109-229
Year 2$240$60-180 BYOK$240 + $60-180
Year 3$240$60-180 BYOK$240 + $60-180
3-year total$720$229-589$949-1,309

Most founders end up running both. The combined cost is comfortably under the standard subscription stack (Notion + ChatGPT + Linear + a few others) and replaces multiple tools.

Free download. Pro is $49 one-time. Lifetime is $99. The first 100 buyers get Lifetime at $29.

Get Projelli